I once said to a class of high school journalism students, "...the difference between taking a snapshot and capturing photo's that stir the imagination is understanding how to see photographically." Seeing photographically is a complex and instinctive subject, but one of the most important and often overlooked elements is the understanding of and using composition effectively.
Light is the key ingredient for all photographs, but composition is the frame upon which light is stretched to build those amazing shots. A simple blog could never fully cover the subject of composition...so what follows is a basic primer on a few of the fundamentals. Using these simple fundamentals help to build the foundation of your photographic skill.
One of the best tools for learning about composition is to use one of those simple point and shoot disposable film cameras. The only thing you can control with that kind of camera is the composition so you can spend more time concentrating on framing the image as opposed to worrying about the exposure. Learning about composition is an ongoing adventure, but lets start with one of the most basic of the concepts: The Rule of Thirds.
Divide your image into a tic-tac-toe grid with nine squares covering the scene. In the middle you will see four points where all the lines intersect. These points are important subject position locations within the frame. You see, in order to generate more visual appeal, your subject should be placed somewhat off center. These four points provide a good position reference. You will also notice that your image is also divided into three separate sections both vertically and horizontally. Generally speaking your image should also be divided into thirds with the foreground material located in the bottom third, middle ground in the middle third, and background in the top third. You can of course use any number of variations on that theme, but the idea is to break apart your image to create a visually appealing composition.
Along those same lines of thought, framing your subject also generates strong points of interest within a scene. Almost anything can be used...like overhanging tree limbs, fences, barn doors, clouds...even light and dark areas...you get the idea. Just think a little creatively and let your imagination take control...the idea is to look for those things that help define the subject.
When you are out photographing, think in terms of angles...or in other words, don't always shoot from eye level. Kneel down or sit low to the ground or rotate the camera. Simple things like that will often give your composition a fresher look.
In an earlier blog entry I wrote about Simplicity of Purpose...or simplifying your composition by making sure that everything in your image is there for a reason and contributes to the overall effect. It does not mean that an image may lack for complex detail, just that it tells one story.
Creative composition is vital to being able to capture memorable moments. The trick is to look for the key elements and then place yourself where you can capture the moment effectively by placing the subject inside the view where it generates a high level of interest.
One of the biggest mistakes novice photographers make is when they shoot sunsets or sunrises. By their dramatic lighting, all of us are attracted to those events, but I can't count the number of times I've looked at photo's of a great sunset that was made mediocre because of the composition. Most of the time the sun is placed in wrong location...square in the middle of the picture...and the horizon splits the image down the middle. Shots like that rarely work well. Usually what you want to do is offset the sun area to one side...remember the tic-tac-toe grid...and then raise or lower the horizon somewhat. Shooting over water offers great reflections and sometimes you can split the image down the middle in those circumstances...but those are rare exceptions.
Composition, like so many other standard rules of photography, is always open to interpretation. Two of the most important things you can do is ONE: Learn about as many of those rules as you can...and TWO: Never be afraid to break them.
Keith
ESTABLISHED 2010 - Beyond The Campfire was created to encourage readers to explore the great outdoors and to observe it close up. Get out and take a hike, go fishing or canoeing, or simply stretch out on a blanket under a summer sky...and take your camera along. We'll talk about combining outdoor activities with photography. We'll look at everything from improving your understanding of the basics of photography to more advanced techniques including things like how to see photographically and capturing the light. We'll explore the night sky, location shoots, using off camera speedlights along with nature and landscape. Grab your camera...strap on your hiking boots...and join me. I think you will enjoy the adventure.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Adventurous Nature
I was talking to someone the other day who asked me if I was a big outdoorsman...she had stumbled onto my blog site. Well...I'm certainly bigger than I used to be, but I must admit I don't get out as much as I used to. I suppose age and other obligations do deplete not only my ability to get out, but the available time to do so....plus this thing called 'work' tends to interfere with all the things I'd rather be doing. Even so, I still find time for some adventure and throwing in a photo trip or two...it's just more compressed and maybe not quite as adventurous as what I did in my younger days.
Speaking of my younger days, this week I discovered a website many of you probably already visit called Hulu that offers full episode viewing of old television programs and movies. I've enjoyed watching some of my old favorites. My generation grew up at the beginning of and during the golden years of the television explosion. I suppose that gives us a unique perspective on the medium. Can't speak for others, but it just seems to me that the old programs were a lot better than most of what you find on television today. There are exceptions of course as programming today tends to be more sophisticated and have more of a biting edge to it...they're also way to explicit in my opinion. Even so, the science and nature programs available today do a good job of not only entertaining, but educating the ordinary viewer with outstanding footage and insight.
When I look back on those early days I realize just how influential many of those programs were to the development of that adventurous nature I seemed to have over the years. Take for instance one of my favorites of all time 'Sea Hunt' staring Lloyd Bridges (Beau and Jeff's dad). The main character was guy named Mike Nelson who ran into all kinds of underwater scuba diving adventures. This program played an important roll inspiring me to take up scuba diving once I was old enough to make that choice for myself...(my parents would never have allowed such a thing...heaven forbid I might actually drown or maybe even have too much fun or something). And how many of you remember 'Rip Chord'? A great adventure show where the two main guys sky dive into all kinds of dangerous exploits.
Now here's another good one...do any of you remember 'The Whirlybirds'. What a great show about a couple of guys who flew into and out of all kinds of adventures using a helicopter. No I never took up skydiving nor did I ever learn how to fly a helicopter...not that I didn't want to...just never had an opportunity to pursue those things, (and I haven't been scuba diving in quite some time). I guess there are some adventure quests best left to the 'Walter Mitty' hopes and dreams most of us have tucked away someplace.
What was important was not so much that I did or did not pursue those kinds of adventures...what really counts is the ideals and spirit of adventure that were nurtured because of them. I probably would never have taken up hunting and fishing or hiking and canoeing..even photography. I more than likely would have never attempted competing in triathlons at the age of 40, nor would I have thought about or enjoyed those two summers as a lifeguard and swimming instructor way too many years ago to admit to. The idea of jumping ship after three years of college looking for adventure by joining the United States Coast Guard and getting involved in search and rescue operations crashing through twenty-five foot breakers along the Oregon coast would never have happened...nor would time spent maintaining an old historic lighthouse.
Those old adventure shows from years ago were not the only things that nurtured the desire for adventure in my life, but they certainly must be included in the conversation because they created a visual point of reference that a young mind grasp onto...and dreamed about doing.
If you just stop and think about it though, one thing my generation...the Baby Boomers...learned how to do was to dream big...seek out the unknown...and challenge ourselves. Those traits have served our generation well as we became the most productive and innovative generation in history. We didn't just use technology, we invented it. We stretched our imaginations well beyond the ordinary and challenged the status quo and reached for...well..the moon.
Even though I've slowed down as I've gotten older, the dreams of adventure from my youth still resonate in my heart. I may never again be able to pursue those things at the same level I once did, but the desire still burns to get out and explore. Maybe that is why I started this blog...so I could experience again and share many of those memories with the few people who may actually visit these pages.
You know...I've only just slowed down a bit...I ain't dead yet...there are still plenty of adventures yet to chase after and I hope to share more with you as time goes by...I hope you join me.
(Would love to hear about some of your own adventures)
Speaking of my younger days, this week I discovered a website many of you probably already visit called Hulu that offers full episode viewing of old television programs and movies. I've enjoyed watching some of my old favorites. My generation grew up at the beginning of and during the golden years of the television explosion. I suppose that gives us a unique perspective on the medium. Can't speak for others, but it just seems to me that the old programs were a lot better than most of what you find on television today. There are exceptions of course as programming today tends to be more sophisticated and have more of a biting edge to it...they're also way to explicit in my opinion. Even so, the science and nature programs available today do a good job of not only entertaining, but educating the ordinary viewer with outstanding footage and insight.
When I look back on those early days I realize just how influential many of those programs were to the development of that adventurous nature I seemed to have over the years. Take for instance one of my favorites of all time 'Sea Hunt' staring Lloyd Bridges (Beau and Jeff's dad). The main character was guy named Mike Nelson who ran into all kinds of underwater scuba diving adventures. This program played an important roll inspiring me to take up scuba diving once I was old enough to make that choice for myself...(my parents would never have allowed such a thing...heaven forbid I might actually drown or maybe even have too much fun or something). And how many of you remember 'Rip Chord'? A great adventure show where the two main guys sky dive into all kinds of dangerous exploits.
Now here's another good one...do any of you remember 'The Whirlybirds'. What a great show about a couple of guys who flew into and out of all kinds of adventures using a helicopter. No I never took up skydiving nor did I ever learn how to fly a helicopter...not that I didn't want to...just never had an opportunity to pursue those things, (and I haven't been scuba diving in quite some time). I guess there are some adventure quests best left to the 'Walter Mitty' hopes and dreams most of us have tucked away someplace.
What was important was not so much that I did or did not pursue those kinds of adventures...what really counts is the ideals and spirit of adventure that were nurtured because of them. I probably would never have taken up hunting and fishing or hiking and canoeing..even photography. I more than likely would have never attempted competing in triathlons at the age of 40, nor would I have thought about or enjoyed those two summers as a lifeguard and swimming instructor way too many years ago to admit to. The idea of jumping ship after three years of college looking for adventure by joining the United States Coast Guard and getting involved in search and rescue operations crashing through twenty-five foot breakers along the Oregon coast would never have happened...nor would time spent maintaining an old historic lighthouse.
Those old adventure shows from years ago were not the only things that nurtured the desire for adventure in my life, but they certainly must be included in the conversation because they created a visual point of reference that a young mind grasp onto...and dreamed about doing.
If you just stop and think about it though, one thing my generation...the Baby Boomers...learned how to do was to dream big...seek out the unknown...and challenge ourselves. Those traits have served our generation well as we became the most productive and innovative generation in history. We didn't just use technology, we invented it. We stretched our imaginations well beyond the ordinary and challenged the status quo and reached for...well..the moon.
Even though I've slowed down as I've gotten older, the dreams of adventure from my youth still resonate in my heart. I may never again be able to pursue those things at the same level I once did, but the desire still burns to get out and explore. Maybe that is why I started this blog...so I could experience again and share many of those memories with the few people who may actually visit these pages.
You know...I've only just slowed down a bit...I ain't dead yet...there are still plenty of adventures yet to chase after and I hope to share more with you as time goes by...I hope you join me.
(Would love to hear about some of your own adventures)
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Post Processing - A Little Goes a Long Ways
Ansel Adams would have loved Photoshop...I'm sure of it...He also would have loved the computing power we have at our disposal today. It was amazing what he accomplished in a darkroom. Just image what he might have accomplished had he been exposed to the various photo enhancing capabilities we have today.
I always strive for and promote 'In the field photo technique'...there is no substitute for a correctly exposed image...(probably a habit from my film days). Although no photo enhancing software can save a badly exposed or composed image, almost every digital image can benefit from a little bit tweaking.
Through trial and error I've developed a workflow that seems to work well for me. About all I do is make minor adjustments to the levels (lights - darks - midtones), a bit of color correction/saturation, contrast, and sharpening...and not all images are treated the same. The time it takes me to complete the process is in most cases is less than a minute and not more than two or three.
Today's photo editing software are marvels of computing power and open the windows to some incredible techniques if properly used. My take on it is to keep it to a minimum and using the least amount of correction required to bring out the texture, flavor, color, and character of the moment. I don't really have space to go into techniques and such in this blog...just wanted to touch on the subject
How you approach post processing depends a great deal on what format the image was taken...RAW or JPEG. Don't expect a long description of both because I couldn't do it justice anyway...but JPEG is a type of compression algorithm that reduces the size of the stored image...then re-expands it when opened. RAW simply stated captures and stores more information allowing for more extended post processing.
What's the difference? Well...there's actually a lot of difference if you start looking closeup and become a pixel peeper...but in reality, a well composed and exposed JPEG image will look just as good as an image taken in RAW format that has undergone extensive post processing. JPEG images may not quite contain enough pixel information to blow the image up to large sizes where as RAW images will probably work better for those types of prints. But...RAW images are harder to work with and require RAW converter software before you can do anything with them, plus they take up lot more storage space...(By the way, RAW images by themselves look like crap and require significant post processing to turn them into a finished picture).
I know some photographers who shoot strictly in RAW while others shoot only JPEG. I do mostly JPEG but will from time to time shoot in RAW.
Anyway...don't think the image that comes out of your camera is in its final form...a little bit of tweaking goes a long ways.
I always strive for and promote 'In the field photo technique'...there is no substitute for a correctly exposed image...(probably a habit from my film days). Although no photo enhancing software can save a badly exposed or composed image, almost every digital image can benefit from a little bit tweaking.
Through trial and error I've developed a workflow that seems to work well for me. About all I do is make minor adjustments to the levels (lights - darks - midtones), a bit of color correction/saturation, contrast, and sharpening...and not all images are treated the same. The time it takes me to complete the process is in most cases is less than a minute and not more than two or three.
Today's photo editing software are marvels of computing power and open the windows to some incredible techniques if properly used. My take on it is to keep it to a minimum and using the least amount of correction required to bring out the texture, flavor, color, and character of the moment. I don't really have space to go into techniques and such in this blog...just wanted to touch on the subject
How you approach post processing depends a great deal on what format the image was taken...RAW or JPEG. Don't expect a long description of both because I couldn't do it justice anyway...but JPEG is a type of compression algorithm that reduces the size of the stored image...then re-expands it when opened. RAW simply stated captures and stores more information allowing for more extended post processing.
What's the difference? Well...there's actually a lot of difference if you start looking closeup and become a pixel peeper...but in reality, a well composed and exposed JPEG image will look just as good as an image taken in RAW format that has undergone extensive post processing. JPEG images may not quite contain enough pixel information to blow the image up to large sizes where as RAW images will probably work better for those types of prints. But...RAW images are harder to work with and require RAW converter software before you can do anything with them, plus they take up lot more storage space...(By the way, RAW images by themselves look like crap and require significant post processing to turn them into a finished picture).
I know some photographers who shoot strictly in RAW while others shoot only JPEG. I do mostly JPEG but will from time to time shoot in RAW.
Anyway...don't think the image that comes out of your camera is in its final form...a little bit of tweaking goes a long ways.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)